Hypermikdash

Back to Temple Menu

 

WHY THE SECOND BAIS HAMIKDASH?

     When you hear someone speak about "The Temple," he could be referring to any one of nine structures:  There was the Mishkan (Tabernacle) that Moses built in the desert.  That was dismantled and carried by the Jews on all their journeys until the nation reached Shilo in  Israel proper - see the timeline.  In Shilo, a house with stone walls was built, but instead of a roof,  it was covered by the same curtains that had covered the tabernacle.
     Then, with the death of Eli HaKohen, the tabernacle in Shilo was destroyed.  replacing it was a more temporary tabernacle,
first in Nov, then in Givon.  So that's four so far...
     Givon was followed by the Temple of King Solomon. Five.  Koresh, king of Persia allowed Ezra and Nechemiya to  build
the Second Temple (just a few years after all the action of Purim).  Three hundred and seventeen years later,  that building was torn down by the quasi-Jewish king, Herod, and was replaced by a magnificent building that, too, was  doomed to destruction at the hands of the Romans.  Seven. There is an opinion that during the rebellion of Bar Kochba that followed the destruction of the Second Temple, a third Temple was built - only to be destroyed in  turn two and a half years later.  That's eight.
     And then, when G-d sees fit, there will be a third Temple. Nine.
    Each of these manifestations of the place in which G-d chose to dwell was different in appearance and purpose  from the others. Each played a different role in preparing the Jewish people and the world in general for their higher calling.  To  completely describe the long and complex history of the Temples would be way beyond the scope of this project (even electronic books have limits!).
     So I had to limit myself to one.  Why, then, was it the Second Temple - the one that Ezra and Nechemiya  built?  I would need no better excuse than the fact that this was the house on which Chazal (the rabbis) themselves concentrated.  If the rabbis of the Talmud - who were renowned for never wasting words - dedicated one whole tractate (Midos) to a straightforward description of this particular bayis, then there must be something there to justify our attention.
     Part of the attraction comes from the fact that many of the measurements and attributes of the Second Temple reflected those of both first (Solomon's) and the third (to  be built in the time of the Messaiah).  Learning about the  Second Temple, therefore, is not simply an historical exercise (as interesting and important as that might be) but has practical relevance to us today.