(Permission is granted to print and redistribute this material
as long as this header and the footer at the end are included.)


prepared by Rabbi Eliezer Chrysler
Kollel Iyun Hadaf, Jerusalem

Previous daf

Menachos 34



(a) The Mezuzah that Rav Huna requires in connection with the skylight leading from the ground floor to the first floor - concerns the door that opens to the enclosed staircase which leads up to the skylight.

(b) If their are two doors, he says, two Mezuzos are required. The second door - opens to the top of the enclosed staircase, which leads down to the ground-floor.

(c) The one door prevents the upstairs residents from entering the ground-floor without permission, whilst the other door prevents the ground floor residents from doing the same upstairs.

(d) Rav Papa extrapolates from Rav Huna - that if a room has four doors - all of them require a Mezuzah.

(a) We ask that in fact, this ruling is obvious, and we answer - that it speaks when one of the doors is used regularly, whilst the others are not (see Shitah Mekubetzes 3).

(b) This ruling differs from the case we learned earlier (in connection with Rav Huna's Shul door), that an entrance that is rarely used is Bateil to one that is used frequently - on the grounds that whereas one door can become Bateil to another, three cannot.

(c) Alternatively, 'Halach Acher ha'Ragil comes to preclude - the Shul door of Rebbi, which was a private doorway, but not a room that requires a number of doors for the many people who use it (even if, after a time, the people begin to use it less frequently, such as in our case).

(a) Ameimar - requires a corner door to have a Mezuzah.

(b) When Rav Ashi queried him about the fact that it only has one door-post, he replied - that the adjacent wall serves as the second door-post.

(c) When Rav Papa (or Rav Mari) arrived in Shmuel's house, he found - that it possessed only the left door-post.

(d) He dismissed the suggestion that Shmuel held like Rebbi Meir - who requires a Mezuzah on a room with only one door-post.

(a) Rav Papa dismissed this suggestion - because even Rebbi Meir will agree that if it the right-hand door-post that is missing, the house is Patur from Mezuzah.

(b) The Beraisa learn from the Pasuk (in connection with Mezuzah) "Beischa" - 'Derech Bi'ascha', implying the right side ...

(c) ... because when a person enters a house, he generally enters with his right foot, as one usually begins walking with the right-foot.

(d) Rabah bar Ula learns this from the box that Yehoyada ha'Kohen fixed on the right hand side of the Azarah as one entered, on the north wall in the vicinity of the Mizbei'ach.

(a) Rebbi Meir in a Beraisa requires a Mezuzah on a room with only one door-post. The Chachamim - exempt it.


1. The Rabbanan learn from the word Mezuzos (plural) that a door is only Chayav Mezuzah if it has two door-posts.
2. According to Rebbi Yishmael in another Beraisa, Rebbi Meir learns from the repetition of the word "Mezuzos" - that even one door-post is Chayav (based on the principle 'Ein Ribuy Achar Ribuy Ela Lema'et').
(c) Rebbi Akiva there maintains that this is not necessary, because he extrapolates from the Pasuk (in connection with the blood of the Korban Pesach) "al ha'Mashkof ve'al Sh'tei he'Mezuzos" - that wherever the Torah does not add a number, "Mezuzos" (even when it is written in the plural) means one door-post.
(a) The Beraisa learns from the 'Gezeirah-Shavah' "u'Chesavtam" (by Mezuzah) "Ve'chasav Lah" (by Get) - that a Mezuzah must be written (not directly on the door-post, but) on a Sefer (i.e. a piece of parchment), and then affixed to the door-post.

(b) Quoting another possible source for the 'Gezeirah-Shavah', we ask that perhaps the Mezuzah must be written directly on the door-post. That source is - "Ve'chasavta al ha'Avanim" (in connection with Har Gerizim and Har Eival).

(c) We opt to learn it from Get, and not from the stones - because the latter were merely a Hora'as Sha'ah (a momentary ruling).

(d) And from the Pasuk "Va'yomer Lahem Baruch, mi'Piv Yikarei ... va'Ani Kosev al ha'Seifer bi'Deyo" - we learn that both a Get and a Mezuzah must be written with ink (as specified in Halachah).

(a) Rav Acha b'rei de'Rava asked Rav Ash how a 'Gezeirah-Shavah' can possibly change the meaning of the words "al Mezuzos" (implying directly on the door-post). He replied ...
1. ... based on the word "u'Chesavtam", followed by "al Mezuzos" - that first it must be written with a proper script ('Kesivah Tamah'), and then placed on the door-post.
2. ... when he asked him why we then need the 'Gezeirah-Shavah' - that without it, we might have thought that one engraves the words on a stone (as this too, is considered 'Kesivah Tamah') which one then affixes to the door-post.
(b) We ask on our Mishnah ( which rules that even one letter is Me'akev) 'P'shita' - to which Rav Yehudah Amar Rav initially replies - that the Tana is referring to the Kutzo shel Yud.

(c) However it seems, that too is obvious. So we cite another statement of Rav Yehudah Amar Rav, where he renders a letter Pasul - if it is not surrounded by parchment (as we explained in our Mishnah) even though it is written correctly.




(a) Rebbi Yishmael in a Beraisa learns the four Parshiyos of Tefilin from the three times that the Torah writes "le'Totafos". Four and not six, in spite of the fact that "le'Totafos" is plural - because two of them are written without a 'Vav', implying the singular ('le'Totefes').

(b) Rebbi Akiva maintains that this is not necessary - because 'Tat' means two in Kaspi and 'Pas', in African (see Shitah 1).

(c) Another Beraisa learns from the Pasuk "u'le'Zikaron Bein Einecha" - that one writes the four Parshiyos on four pieces of K'laf (parchment), which one places into four compartments made out of *one* piece of K'laf ...

(d) ... and not into four compartments made of *four* pieces of K'laf.

(a) According to Rebbi, if one writes all four Parshiyos on one piece of K'laf - the Tefilin are nevertheless Kasher.

(b) And the space that Rebbi nevertheless requires in between the Parshiyos, one achieves - by making three cuts into the top of the K'laf to form four fingers (thereby separating the four Parshiyos), and then placing each finger (i.e. each Parshah) into one of the four compartments.

(c) The Chachamim do not consider this necessary - though they do require each Parshah at least to be bound with an independent thread.

(d) The Beraisa concludes 've'Im Ein Charitzan Nikar, Pesulos' - meaning that if, from the outside, one cannot see that the Bayis comprises four compartments, the Tefilin are Pasul.

(a) The Tefilin shel Yad are written - one piece of parchment.

(b) Rebbi Yehudah permits writing it on four pieces, on condition - that he sews or glues them together before placing them inside the Bayis.

(c) And he learns this from the Pasuk "Ve'hayah Lecha le'Os al Yadcha" - implying that the Tefilin shel Yad must be one sign (and not four) on the inside (which is 'for you'), just as they are one sign on the outside (which others see).

(d) Rebbi Yossi maintains - that this is not necessary.

(a) According to Rebbi Yossi - Rebbi Yehudah b'Rebbi concedes that someone who has two pairs of Tefilin shel Rosh, but no Tefilin shel Yad - may convert one of them into Tefilin shel Yad by merely covering the outside with a piece of skin.

(b) By 'Rebbi Yehudah b'Rebbi', he meant - Rebbi Yehudah the Chacham.

(c) In spite of the fact that it is in this very point that they argue, Rava explained Rebbi Yossi's statement to mean - that Rebbi Yehudah relented from his original stance.

(a) Rav Chananyah in the name of Rav - permits converting Tefilin shel Yad into shel Rosh, but not vice-versa ...

(b) ... because the Tefilin shel Rosh possess a higher level of Kedushah than the shel Yad (and it is forbidden to downgrade Kedushah).

(c) This distinction is created by virtue of the fact - that the majority of Hashem's Name 'Shakai' is to be found on the shel Rosh (the 'Shin' on the Bayis, and the 'Daled' on the strap), whereas only the 'Yud' appears on the (strap of) the shel Yad.

(d) To reconcile Rebbi Yossi's previous statement with that of Rav Chananyah in the name of Rav, we establish it ...

1. ... by new Tefilin that have never been used, assuming that we hold 'Hazmanah La'av Milsa Hi' (in which case until the Tefilin have been worn, they (the Batim) have no Kedushah.
2. ... when the owner stipulated at the outset that he would be permitted to use the shel Rosh as the shel Yad, should this become necessary, according to those who hold 'Hazmanah Milsa Hi'.
(a) The Beraisa requires 'Kadeish' and 'Ve'hayah ki Yevi'acha' to be on the right side of the Tefilin, and 'Sh'ma' and 'Ve'hayah im Shamo'a' on the left. Abaye reconciles this with the Beraisa, which says the opposite - by establishing the former from the point of view of the reader; and the latter, of that of the wearer.

(b) The significance of the statement 've'ha'Korei, Korei ke'Sidran' is - that, seeing as 'Sh'ma' is on the inside, next to 'Ve'hayah ki Yevi'acha', this follows the order in which they are written in the Torah (see Tosfos DH 've'ha'Korei').

Next daf


For further information on
subscriptions, archives and sponsorships,
contact Kollel Iyun Hadaf,