REVIEW QUESTIONS ON GEMARA AND RASHI
prepared by Rabbi Eliezer Chrysler
Kollel Iyun Hadaf, Jerusalem
Previous daf Gitin 77
GITIN 77-79 - Dedicated by an admirer of the work of the Dafyomi Advancement
Forum, l'Iluy Nishmas Mrs. Gisela Turkel, Golda bas Reb Chaim Yitzchak Ozer,
(a) What does Abaye say about a case where a man dies at night after saying
(b) The same will apply to 'le'che'she'Lo Avo le'Achar Sh'neim-Asar Chodesh'
and 'al-M'nas she'Lo Avo le'Achar Sh'neim-Asar Chodesh'. The Machlokes
between the Tana of our Mishnah and Raboseinu of the Beraisa is confined to
a case of 'Im Teitzei ha'Chamah' (or 'Im Meisi').
- ... 'le'che'she'Teitzei Chamah mi'Narteikah'?
- ... 'al-M'nas she'Teitzei Chamah mi'Narteikah'?
What is the basis of
(a) 'Kisvu u'T'nu Get le'Ishti Im Lo Ba'asi mi'Ka'an ve'Ad Sh'teim-Esrei
Chodesh, Kasvu be'Soch Sh'neim-Esrei Chodesh, ve'Nasnu le'Achar Sh'neim-Asar
Chodesh ... Rebbi Yossi Omer, ka'Zeh Get'.
Rav Yeimar asked Rav Ashi
whether Rebbi Yossi argues on principle, because he holds that we ignore any
T'nai by Gitin.
What are the ramifications of this contention?
(b) What did Rav Ashi answer him?
(c) What do the Rabbanan hold?
(a) By when must the husband have returned if he said 'Harei Zeh Gitech Im
Lo Ba'asi ad le'Achar ...
***** Hadran Alach 'Mi she'Achzo' *****
(b) Rebbi Zeira asked Rebbi Asi (or Rebbi Asi, Rebbi Yochanan) what the time
period 'le'Achar ha'Shabbos' would constitute.
- ... Shavu'a Zu'?
- ... Shanah Zu'?
- ... Chodesh'?
What did he answer him?
(c) According to Rebbi, 'le'Achar ha'Regel' constitutes thirty days.
was it, that when Rebbi Chiya Darshened this in the name of Rebbi, they all
praised him, but when he Darshened it in the name of the Rabbanan, they
***** Perek ha'Zorek *****
(a) What will be the Din if a husband throws a Get to his wife assuming that
she is ...
(b) If, in the latter case, he throws the Get on to the bed that they are
sharing, will she be divorced?
- ... in her own house or Chatzer?
- ... in his house or Chatzer?
(c) Will she be divorced if he tosses the Get into her lap or into her
(a) How do we learn from the phrase in Ki Seitzei "ve'Nasan be'Yadah" that a
woman is divorced even if her husband throws the Get on her roof, or into
her courtyard or enclosure?
(b) We learn the same with regard to a thief, from the double expression
used by the Pasuk in Mishpatim "Im Himatzei Simatzei be'Yado ha'Geneivah".
What are the ramifications of this D'rashah?
(c) Having taught us that one's Reshus is considered like one's hand with
regard to Kinyanim by ...
(d) If a thief would not acquire an animal via the Kinyan of Chatzer, he
would acquire it by means of a Kinyan Meshichah.
- ... a Get, why does the Torah find it necessary to repeat it by a thief?
- ... a thief, why does the Torah need to repeat it by a Get?
How is it possible to
effect a Kinyan Chatzer without Meshichah?
(a) Considering that a husband acquires rights in his wife's property when
he marries her, how can she be divorced by his placing a Get in her Chatzer?
(b) The Beraisa states that if a partner writes out a document on which he
states that he withdraws from his share of the field, this does not give the
remaining partner full ownership of the field.
Why is that?
(c) Then how will the husband writing that he withdraws from his wife's
property make any difference with regard to a Get?
(a) What does ...
Answers to questions
(b) Which Takanas Chazal is Rava referring to when he says 'K'gon Zu'?
- ... Rav Kahana say about withdrawing from property that comes from another source? What does he mean by 'another source'?
- ... Rava say about someone who says that he declines to accept a Takanas Chachamim that is for his benefit?
(c) What did Rav Huna Amar Rav say there?
(a) Based on the clear-cut Din of 'Yadah', how does Rava prove that it is
not necessary to establish the Din of Chatzer when he withdrew from shis
(b) Then on what grounds will the woman acquire her Get, by both Yad and
(c) How does Ravina refute Rava's proof from the Yad of a woman?
(d) Rav Ashi counters that Rava's proof is not really from the Yad of a
woman, but from that of an Eved Cana'ani.
How does Rava prove there that
'Gito ve'Yado Ba'in ke'Echad'?
(a) What was the problem in the case of that Shechiv-Mera who wrote a Get
for his wife just before Shabbos came in and then, on Shabbos, he took a
turn for the worse?
(b) What did Rava advise him to do? Which Mishnah in Bava Basra served as
the basis for Rava's advice?
(c) What did Rav Ilish comment that caused Rava to become embarrassed?
(d) What did Rava subsequently discover that alleviated his embarrassment?
(a) How did Rava subsequently reverse his previous ruling?
(b) But did we not quote him earlier as having said this?
(a) We learned in our Mishnah that if the woman is in her house, and her
husband throws her a Get, she is divorced. Ula takes this literally to mean
that she must be standing in or next to her house when her husband gives her
the Get (see Tosfos DH 've'Hu').
How does Rebbi Oshaya explain it?
(b) Why is it not necessary for her to be there, according to him?
(c) On what do we initially base their Machlokes?
(a) We conclude that both learn Chatzer from Yad.
How does Rebbi Oshaya
counter Ula's proof that, like her Yad, her Chatzer must be close?
(b) Then in what way does he compare Chatzer to Yad?
(a) What did Rav Yosef rule in the case where a man threw his wife a Get,
which fell on a large block of wood?
Answers to questions
(b) Why can this not be speaking when the block of wood was in her Chatzer?
(c) We therefore establish it when it was in *his* Chatzer.
difference would it then make if the wood was more than four by four Amos?
(d) In which two instances would she not be divorced even if the block of
wood was less than four by four Amos?